Affiliate disclosure: We may earn commission from operators we recommend. This doesn't affect our independent ratings.
Timed Test

How Long Does a Cloudbet Bitcoin Withdrawal Actually Take?

By QuickWithdrawals Editorial Team··6 min read

One question, one measured answer: our real-money test of a **Bitcoin** withdrawal from Cloudbet completed in **1 minute 37 seconds**, timed from the moment we submitted the request to the moment the funds were confirmed in our wallet. It is logged as test **QW-2026-0008** in our test register, run in September 2026, and it is the fastest single result we hold for any casino. This page gives you that figure, the method behind it, the caveats that come with one run, and how it sits against every other casino we have timed.

The Tested Result: A Bitcoin Withdrawal in 1 Minute 37 Seconds

The number: 1 minute 37 seconds. That is the total elapsed time for a real-money Bitcoin withdrawal from Cloudbet, measured from the moment we submitted the withdrawal request to the moment the funds were confirmed in our wallet. It is logged as test QW-2026-0008 in our test register, run in September 2026.

That single figure is the entire claim. We are not turning one run into a guaranteed average, and we are not repeating Cloudbet's own marketing. It is one withdrawal, on one network, timed end to end.

What it means in practice. At just over a minute and a half, this is the fastest single run in our test bank — quicker than Rollbit's 1m 59s and Jack.com's 2m 45s, and marginally ahead of Stake's five-run average of 1m 52s. It is not, however, faster than the quickest individual Stake run we recorded (1m 25s on USDT TRC-20). At this end of the scale the gaps are seconds, and no player would feel the difference.

The honest caveats, stated up front rather than in a footnote. This is a single run. The amount withdrawn was not recorded, no transaction hash was captured, and the date is logged only to the month. That means the figure cannot be checked against a block explorer by you or by us. We publish it as a measured result, not an independently verifiable one.

One correction worth knowing about. An earlier version of our Cloudbet write-up carried a third-party estimate of 15 minutes to 2 hours. That estimate was wrong, and our own timed run replaced it. We mention it because it is the clearest argument we can make for timing withdrawals yourself rather than aggregating other people's guesses.

How We Measured It

A payout time only means something if you know where the clock started and stopped. Ours runs from request submitted to funds confirmed in our wallet — the wait a player actually experiences, not the casino's internal approval step measured in isolation.

StepWhat we did
1. Verification firstAccount verification was handled before testing, so the measured time reflects payout processing rather than a document check sitting in a queue.
2. No bonus attachedNo promotion claimed, so no wagering requirement could hold the balance.
3. Clock startTimestamp taken at the moment the withdrawal request was submitted.
4. Clock stopTimestamp taken when the Bitcoin transaction was confirmed and the funds were in our wallet.
5. Logged as one entryCoin, network and elapsed time recorded together in a single register entry. Nothing on this page is spliced together from separate runs.

Our full testing protocol is documented on our methodology page. Where a run is missing on-chain proof, as this one is, we say so on the page itself.

Why we do not publish a Cloudbet average. One run is not an average, so we do not present it as one. Where we do quote an average — Stake's 1m 52s across five runs, for instance — it is computed from the individual logged entries, never typed in by hand. A hand-written roll-up is exactly how a wrong number gets repeated across a site, and it has happened to us.

Why one run is still worth publishing. A single timed withdrawal is weak evidence about a casino's typical speed but strong evidence about one thing: that the casino paid out, promptly, to a real tester on a real account. Operators that never pay are not slow — they are a different problem entirely, and a completed test rules that out.

What Determines Your Own Cloudbet Withdrawal Time

There are two clocks on every crypto casino payout, and either one can explain a slower result than ours.

Clock one — internal processing. Automated approval is near-instant; a manual or compliance review is not. First withdrawals, amounts that are unusually large relative to your account history, and flagged accounts are the standard triggers across the industry, at Cloudbet as anywhere else. Our 1m 37s run suggests Cloudbet's automated approval path is quick — the request was clearly broadcast almost immediately.

Clock two — network confirmation. Once the transaction is broadcast, arrival is down to the chain you chose. No casino controls this part.

The coin you pick is the lever you actually control. We timed the Bitcoin route, and Bitcoin waits on block confirmation — it gets slower and more expensive when the mempool is busy. As a general property of the networks rather than a Cloudbet measurement: USDT on TRC-20 and coins such as Litecoin and XRP typically confirm faster and more cheaply, while USDT on ERC-20 can carry heavy gas costs during congestion. Cloudbet has historically centred on Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash and supports a range of major coins alongside them; the live list is the one shown in the cashier when you withdraw. We have only timed the Bitcoin route here, so we quote no figure for the others.

The three things that most often add time:

CauseWhat to do about it
Pending verificationVerify early rather than at the moment you want your money out. A verification check sitting in a queue is the single most common cause of a multi-hour wait anywhere in this industry.
Unmet bonus wageringBonus-locked winnings do not withdraw at all until the requirement is cleared. Read the terms of any promotion before you claim it, not after you try to cash out.
Network congestionIf speed matters more than habit, choose a faster network in the cashier. It is the quickest thing you can change once the account is open — though on our own tested data the choice of casino moves the number by more.

Cloudbet is also frequently cited as having one of the cleaner no-ID stories among long-established operators, with verification kicking in above a threshold or when an account is flagged. Thresholds and policies change, so treat that as something to confirm in Cloudbet's current terms rather than a fixed guarantee — and if you plan larger withdrawals, verifying early is still the simplest way to avoid a hold. The current coin list, limits and cashier terms are the ones shown at Cloudbet when you withdraw — we would rather point you at the live cashier than quote a list that ages.

How Cloudbet Compares to the Other Casinos We Have Timed

Every figure below traces to a numbered entry in our register, and every average is computed from those entries rather than typed in. A casino we have not tested gets no time — we do not fill the gap with an estimate, an operator claim, or a number borrowed from another site.

CasinoCoin testedMeasured timeRuns logged
Stake (fastest single run)USDT — TRC-201m 25s5
CloudbetBTC1m 37s1
Stake (average of 5 runs)BTC / ETH / USDT1m 52s5
RollbitBTC1m 59s1
Jack.comBTC2m 45s1
BitStarzBTC4m 39s1
BC.Game (average of 6 runs)BTC / ETH / USDT4m 45s6
Roobet (average of 5 runs)BTC / ETH / USDT6m 10s5
7BitNot recorded8m 15s1

Read the 'runs logged' column before you read the times. Cloudbet's figure is a single Bitcoin run. Stake's 1m 52s rests on five runs across three coins, BC.Game's 4m 45s on six, Roobet's 6m 10s on five. A single fast result is weaker evidence than a slower average built from five or six runs, and where the coin differs the network can account for the whole gap on its own.

What the table does support is a coarse but useful conclusion: every casino we have timed paid out in single-digit minutes, and the spread from fastest to slowest was under seven minutes. At that scale the gaps are minutes rather than days — but they are not noise: our Bitcoin runs alone range from 1m 37s here to 9m 21s elsewhere, on the same network, which is a wider spread than any network choice produced within a single casino in our tests.

The full ranking, with the tested figure behind each position, is at fastest paying casinos. The wider Cloudbet write-up — licensing, coins, KYC thresholds, limits and fees — is in our Cloudbet review, and the payments detail is in Cloudbet withdrawals.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does a Cloudbet withdrawal actually take in timed tests?

In our timed test, a Bitcoin withdrawal from Cloudbet completed in 1 minute 37 seconds, measured from the moment the request was submitted to the moment the funds were confirmed in our wallet. It is logged as test QW-2026-0008 in our test register, run in September 2026. That is a single run rather than a guaranteed average — your own time depends on the coin and network you choose, network conditions, and whether your account triggers a manual review.

Is Cloudbet the fastest crypto casino for withdrawals?

On the figures we have measured, Cloudbet holds the fastest single-casino result in our test bank at 1m 37s — ahead of Rollbit (1m 59s), Jack.com (2m 45s) and Stake's five-run average of 1m 52s. Two caveats matter. The quickest individual run we have recorded anywhere is still Stake's 1m 25s on USDT TRC-20. And Cloudbet's figure rests on one run while Stake's rests on five, so it is the thinner piece of evidence despite being the faster number.

Which coin is fastest to withdraw from Cloudbet?

We have only timed the Bitcoin route, so we will not quote a figure for the others. As a general property of the networks rather than a Cloudbet measurement: USDT on TRC-20, Litecoin and XRP tend to confirm quickly and cheaply, while USDT on ERC-20 can be slow and expensive during congestion and Bitcoin waits on block confirmation. Cloudbet's live coin list is the one shown in its cashier at the time you withdraw.

Why is my Cloudbet withdrawal still pending?

The usual causes, in the order they tend to come up: a manual or compliance review triggered by a first or unusually large withdrawal, a pending identity verification check, an unmet bonus wagering requirement, or congestion on the network you selected. Verifying your account before you want to withdraw removes the most common one.

How do you measure crypto casino withdrawal times?

End to end: the clock starts when the withdrawal request is submitted and stops when the funds are confirmed in our wallet. Verification is completed before testing and no bonus is attached, so the figure reflects payout speed rather than a document check or a wagering requirement. Each run is logged as a single register entry recording coin, network and elapsed time together, so attributes are never combined across different runs, and any average we publish is computed from those entries rather than typed in.

Is the 1m 37s Cloudbet figure verified on-chain?

No, and we would rather say so plainly. QW-2026-0008 is a trust-based run: the coin, network and elapsed time were recorded by our tester, but no transaction hash and no amount were captured, so it cannot be checked on a block explorer. Our register is moving to a policy under which nothing publishes without a resolvable transaction hash, and runs like this one will need to be repeated with on-chain proof before that switch.